Subscribe Sign in

Sport

UK Football Police Unit accused of ‘bringing Hillsborough’ into alcohol debate

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

FootballSport

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A3×2 A6 C2×2 C5×2 D2×6 D3×2 E3×6 E5 F2 all 30 rules
  • UKFPU cites post-Hillsborough Taylor Report in backing ban.
  • Talk of changing the law to allow fans to drink at their seat or in the stands has resurfaced after Andy Burnham, the prime minister, said the rules were outdated and discriminatory and should be ended.
  • The FSA published a thread on its X account setting out its position on drinking in the stands, which began: “ the point is that the UK Football Policing Unit’s comments bringing Hillsborough into this debate have to be corrected.
  • Burnham’s comments have preceded social media debate in which differing views have been expressed by match-going fans.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

UKFPU cites post-Hillsborough Taylor Report in backing ban. The disaster was not caused by alcohol.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

All three things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

UKFPU cites post-Hillsborough Taylor Report in backing ban.

English football’s leading fans’ group has criticised the UK Football Policing Unit for “bringing Hillsborough into the debate” around drinking in sight of the pitch.

Talk of changing the law to allow fans to drink at their seat or in the stands has resurfaced after Andy Burnham, the prime minister, said the rules were outdated and discriminatory and should be ended.

“The UKFPU would welcome a meeting with the prime minister to discuss his views and explain the challenges these proposed changes would bring to policing and the safety of staff and fans at football games.”

The Taylor Report referenced by the UKFPU was commissioned in the wake of the 1989 Hillsborough disaster, which resulted in the deaths of 97 Liverpool fans.

The FSA published a thread on its X account setting out its position on drinking in the stands, which began: “ the point is that the UK Football Policing Unit’s comments bringing Hillsborough into this debate have to be corrected. The disaster was not caused by alcohol.”

Burnham’s comments have preceded social media debate in which differing views have been expressed by match-going fans.

The FSA’s post on Thursday added: “It’s unfair to criminalise fans for having a pint – especially since you can sit in the same seat drinking alcohol whilst watching an Oasis gig or rugby league.”

“That doesn’t mean every club should be forced to serve alcohol to every seat!”

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 4 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Sport)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Sport)as they published this story 13.8 4 59 -0.2 8.6
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Sport) 10.8 3 59 -0.2 8.6

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works