The Bank of England has also voted to slow the pace of its bond selling programme, as well as leaving interest rates on hold.
Today’s decision follows criticism that QT has been pushing up government borrowing costs, because the Bank’s sale of gilts increases the yield on government debt.
The Bank currently holds £488bn of gilts through its asset purchase programme (created after the financial crisis), which bought debt with newly created money.
3 sentences from our version of the report,
chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below.
How
The one thing this headline claims is in the report.
Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked
Full article, in plain language
The Bank of England has also voted to slow the pace of its bond selling programme, as well as leaving interest rates on hold.
At this week’s meeting, the Bank’s monetary policy committee has decided to unwind its quantitative tightening programme at an annual average pace of £46bn by the end of 2034.
That will be conducted through annual sales of £20bn, plus £26bn per year of gilts which mature.
That’s down from a previous QT pace of £70bn, and a larger slowdown than expected (the City had expected QT to be slowed to £50bn).
Today’s decision follows criticism that QT has been pushing up government borrowing costs, because the Bank’s sale of gilts increases the yield on government debt. The Bank also makes a loss on the sale, which lands on the taxpayer.
The Bank currently holds £488bn of gilts through its asset purchase programme (created after the financial crisis), which bought debt with newly created money.
It has decided to set aside £120bn of bonds to back the issuance of banknotes, and wind down the remaining £368bn by the end of 2034.
You are reading our version, not theirs.
This is The Guardian Australia (Business)'s report with its
verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives
that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations
are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure
this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.
How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it
No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.
Readers can ask a question about this story here.
Questions and answers are for subscribers.
Sign in
to read them.
Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look.
Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason,
so the decision can be looked at again. How this works