Subscribe Sign in

World

UK ‘losing up to £6.5bn a year in EU trade’ without post-Brexit product deal

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

BrexitInternational TradeTrade PolicyEuropean UnionUK News

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: UK ‘losing up to £6.5bn a year in EU trade’ due to mismatched without post-Brexit product rulesdeal

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: D2×3 D3×6 D4 all 30 rules
  • IPPR finds failure to align testing standards has forced companies to abandon exporting to EU and is costing costing 0.18% of national income.
  • The thinktank estimated that the absence of such a deal may have cost UK exporters between £3.7bn and £6.5bn each year in lost revenue since the UK’s post-Brexit trading arrangements came into force in 2021.

2 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

The thinktank estimated that the absence of such a deal may have cost UK exporters between £3.7bn and £6.5bn each year in lost revenue since the UK’s post-Brexit trading arrangements.

The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How

Headline check

One of the two things this headline claims is not in the report.

  • The headline puts “‘losing up to £6.5bn a year in EU trade’” in quotation marks. Nobody says those words anywhere in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

IPPR finds failure to align testing standards has forced companies to abandon exporting to EU and is costing costing 0.18% of national income.

The UK is losing out on annual exports to the EU that could be worth as much as £6.5bn without a deal with Brussels that allows manufacturers to jettison duplicate product testing.

In the latest attempt to calculate the loss of trade with the EU after Brexit, the IPPR thinktank said many companies have given up selling goods to the EU or set up subsidiaries inside the trade bloc after successive governments failed to secure a mutual recognition agreement that would avoid the extra administration costs.

The thinktank estimated that the absence of such a deal may have cost UK exporters between £3.7bn and £6.5bn each year in lost revenue since the UK’s post-Brexit trading arrangements came into force in 2021.

At this week’s Liberal Democrat conference, the party’s leader, Ed Davey, said that should the party take control at Westminster, he would begin talks to rejoin the EU single market and customs union.

Earlier this year, the Starmer administration pitched the creation of a single market for goods between the UK and EU to Brussels, but the proposal was rejected by EU officials.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5.6 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Business)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Business)as they published this story 6.6 10 68 -0.1 52.5
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Business) 6.6 10 68 -0.1 52.5

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works