Subscribe Sign in

US criticises Australia's proposed algorithm opt-out laws as 'censorship'

1 min read Rewritten in plain language
Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 C2 D2 D4 E3×9 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • Under Australia's draft digital duty of care laws, tech firms risk fines if they fail to give users the option to turn off algorithms in a bid to protect them from harmful content.
  • Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the legislation was not about giving governments control but giving it back to people.
  • The US also called on Australia to address industry concerns that the "biases and preferences" of government officials do not "disadvantage independent or minority-viewpoint speech".
  • Australia has banned social media for kids under 16.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

The US has criticised Australia's proposal to give users the ability to opt out of social media algorithms, saying it amounts to "censorship of protected speech".

Under Australia's draft digital duty of care laws, tech firms risk fines if they fail to give users the option to turn off algorithms in a bid to protect them from harmful content.

In a submission to the proposed laws, the US embassy in Canberra said it had "serious concerns" and allowing the government to "enforce vague definitions of 'harm'" would lead to "viewpoint-based censorship".

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the legislation was not about giving governments control but giving it back to people.

An opt-out option would "allow regulators to impose rigid, one-size-fits-all platform design requirements" on tech firms and this could affect users outside of Australia, it said.

The US also called on Australia to address industry concerns that the "biases and preferences" of government officials do not "disadvantage independent or minority-viewpoint speech".

On Tuesday, local time in New York, Albanese responded to the criticism and claims of the proposed laws being government overreach.

Australia has banned social media for kids under 16.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 3.2 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is BBC News (Technology)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
BBC News (Technology)as they published this story 7.9 3 76 -0.4 45.8
Mundane Readneutralized from BBC News (Technology) 5.6 1 76 -0.4 45.8

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works