Subscribe Sign in

Politics / United States

US attacks Australia's 'opt-out' algorithm law in intervention

ABC News
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Social mediaArtificial intelligenceGovernment and PoliticsPolitics

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: US says Australian digital care bill would 'facilitate censorship'attacks Australia's 'opt-out' algorithm law in rare intervention

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A2×2 A3×2 C2 D2×3 D3×3 E3×10 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • In an uncommon move, the US government has publicly criticised an Australian government policy proposal.
  • The Trump administration has made a public intervention into Australia's debate about its proposed digital duty of care, warning the Albanese government that the policy would be "extraterritorial censorship of protected speech".
  • The submission, published by the US Embassy today, said Washington had "serious concerns" about how Australia would decide what counts as "foreseeable harm".
  • The US government's hostility toward the digital duty of care was signposted earlier this month in a statement from White House spokesperson Kush Desai to the Guardian Australia.
  • The Albanese government said it would use this law, if passed, to force platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to send users a pop-up offering a choice between a personalised algorithmic feed and a feed limited to accounts they follow.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

Headline as published: US attacks Australia's 'opt-out' algorithm law in rare intervention

One of the two things this headline claims is not in the report.

  • The headline puts “opt-out” in quotation marks. Nobody says those words anywhere in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

In an uncommon move, the US government has publicly criticised an Australian government policy proposal.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is in New York promoting Australian tech policies at the United Nations.

The Trump administration has made a public intervention into Australia's debate about its proposed digital duty of care, warning the Albanese government that the policy would be "extraterritorial censorship of protected speech".

The public rebuke took the form of a response to a consultation on the draft digital duty of care bill, which would force platforms to take actions to mitigate and respond to harms caused by digital platforms.

The submission, published by the US Embassy today, said Washington had "serious concerns" about how Australia would decide what counts as "foreseeable harm".

His support for international AI regulation and his government's teen social media ban have earned the ire of the Trump administration.

In the submission, the US government said it was concerned by what it described as rigid, one-size-fits-all design requirements.

The US government's hostility toward the digital duty of care was signposted earlier this month in a statement from White House spokesperson Kush Desai to the Guardian Australia.

Earlier today, it was reported by Politico Australia that the American industry body representing American tech companies had joined in a High Court challenge to Australia's teen social media ban.

The Albanese government said it would use this law, if passed, to force platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to send users a pop-up offering a choice between a personalised algorithmic feed and a feed limited to accounts they follow.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6.5 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 11.9 13 67 -0.1 46.4
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 8.6 10 67 -0.3 46.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works