Subscribe Sign in

Politics

PM rejects ‘nonsense’ suggestion he delayed revealing OpenAI Medicare hack as Labor considers changing laws

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

PoliticsArtificial intelligenceAnthony AlbaneseTechnology

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: ‘Wake-up call’: PM rejects ‘nonsense’ suggestion he delayed revealing OpenAI Medicare hack as Labor considers changing Australian lawsafter OpenAI Medicare hack

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A6 D3×7 D4 F2 all 30 rules
  • Expert says Australia’s criminal laws should be clarified to determine how fault is applied to a corporation when its AI agent commits a crime.
  • On Friday, the government said the review by spy agency, the Australian signals directorate, would consider whether legislative change was needed after the prime minister revealed an artificial intelligence agent developed by OpenAI hacked Medicare’s statistics website and three other systems in June.
  • Labor has announced it would legislate an AI standard, which Charlton said would be informed by the rapid review.
  • Anthony Albanese told the Asia Society on Thursday that the incident was a “wake-up call” about the risks of AI, and whether humans would remain in charge of the technology.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

One of the three things this headline claims is not in the report.

  • The headline puts “‘nonsense’” in quotation marks. Nobody says those words anywhere in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Expert says Australia’s criminal laws should be clarified to determine how fault is applied to a corporation when its AI agent commits a crime.

The federal government could change Australian laws if the current legal framework could not respond to the OpenAI hack of Medicare, ministers have confirmed.

On Friday, the government said the review by spy agency, the Australian signals directorate, would consider whether legislative change was needed after the prime minister revealed an artificial intelligence agent developed by OpenAI hacked Medicare’s statistics website and three other systems in June.

If current laws could not touch the tech giant, they would need updating, environment minister Murray Watt said on Friday.

The assistant minister for technology and the digital economy, Andrew Charlton, acknowledged similar incidents would become “more and more prevalent into the future” and the government would need to be prepared.

Labor has announced it would legislate an AI standard, which Charlton said would be informed by the rapid review. The government has said it wants the bill to be introduced by the end of the year.

Bennett Moses said existing civil laws are more likely to deal with these sorts of incidents, that would allow a government or individual to seek compensation an AI company for harm “negligently caused by that corporation”.

Anthony Albanese told the Asia Society on Thursday that the incident was a “wake-up call” about the risks of AI, and whether humans would remain in charge of the technology.

On Friday, the prime minister addressed the United Nations and called on other countries to act to “shape artificial intelligence development, rather than be passively shaped by it”.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 3 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 5.8 6 92 -0.3 50.7
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 5.2 5 92 -0.2 50.7

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works