Subscribe Sign in

Politics / Canberra, ACT

War of words over Greens' proposal to co-locate data centres and pools

3 min read Rewritten in plain language

State and Territory ParliamentPoliticsData centresLocal Government

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A9 C2 D2×2 D3 D4 E3×2 all 30 rules
  • The proposal is one part of an ACT Greens' motion calling for new data centres to implement best-practice water and energy consumption.
  • A war of words has began over a suggestion from the ACT Greens that co-locating data centres with Canberra's public pools should be considered.
  • The motion includes several elements, but one point, calling on the ACT government to "consider co-locating data centres with public pools to use cooling water as a heating source", has drawn criticism from Chief Minister Andrew Barr.
  • Ms Nuttall also raised concern about a Facebook post made by Mr Barr, which showed an image of a pool next to a large data centre.
  • Opposition leader Mark Parton said while he thought a discussion about data centres was "really important" to be had, he said the Canberra Liberals were also not supportive of the pool suggestion and the moratorium.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

The ACT Chief Minister has dismissed a suggestion that future data centres could be built alongside public pools, to use their cooling water as a heat source.

The proposal is one part of an ACT Greens' motion calling for new data centres to implement best-practice water and energy consumption.

The ACT government expects a new framework on data centres to be released next year.

A war of words has began over a suggestion from the ACT Greens that co-locating data centres with Canberra's public pools should be considered.

The idea is included in a motion set to be debated in the ACT Legislative Assembly this week by Greens MLA Laura Nuttall.

The motion includes several elements, but one point, calling on the ACT government to "consider co-locating data centres with public pools to use cooling water as a heating source", has drawn criticism from Chief Minister Andrew Barr.

"The primary and best location for data centres is exactly where they have been planned and built in the ACT for decades, and that is in industrial zones," Mr Barr said.

Ms Nuttall said she was "disappointed" but "not surprised" by Mr Barr's reaction.

"Mr Barr has not taken our motion in the best faith possible," she said.

"We are just asking the government to consider it, we are not actually asking them to commit to doing it."

Ms Nuttall also raised concern about a Facebook post made by Mr Barr, which showed an image of a pool next to a large data centre.

"I felt it was a wilful misrepresentation of what the ACT Greens are actually asking the government to do," she said.

"We are not talking about a large data centre like the one that we suspect Mr Barr has AI-generated on his Facebook page.

"We are talking about things like in the UK, where as far back as 2023, they have had data centres the size of washing machines powering public pool."

Ms Nuttall described the post as "a bit cringe" and said it was a "blatant attempt to divert community attention away from what actually matters".

"What? The Greens are going to now start suggesting that Facebook posts are inappropriate?" he said.

Ms Nuttall said the pool suggestion was only a "small part" of the wider motion, which also called for a moratorium on new data centres in Canberra until a new framework was in place.

"We want to make sure that the ACT government enshrines best practice in how data centres use energy and water," she said.

Mr Barr said the government would also not be supporting a call for a moratorium.

"I am not in the business of turning down investment in new data centres that support important elements for our university sector, for the Australian government, for things like climate and weather modelling," he said.

The debate comes a week after the Greens ended their long-standing confidence and supply agreement with Labor.

But Mr Barr said it was not unusual for the Greens and Labor to disagree, and said MLAs could expect "greater scrutiny on the fine detail of private members' motions".

"We have always had points of difference," he said.

Opposition leader Mark Parton said while he thought a discussion about data centres was "really important" to be had, he said the Canberra Liberals were also not supportive of the pool suggestion and the moratorium.

The ACT government estimates there are already 15 data centres in Canberra, and expects a new framework on data centres to be released next year.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News (Business)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC News (Business)as they published this story 8.9 5 78 -0.2 51.1
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News (Business) 7.1 4 78 -0.0 51.1

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works