Subscribe Sign in

Business / Western Australia

Will making WA's freight rail network public be cost-effective?

ABC News
3 min read Rewritten in plain language

Rail Transport IndustryAgricultureState and Territory Parliament

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: Will making WA's freight rail network public be cost-effective?

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A2 A3×2 A4 A9 D1 D2×6 D3×10 E3 F1 F2 all 30 rules
  • Twenty-six years after Western Australia's freight rail network was privatised, the WA government is making headway on its plan to buy it back.
  • Every year, millions of tonnes of grain and minerals travel across 5,500 kilometres of tracks, connecting the ports of Geraldton, Fremantle, Bunbury, Albany and Esperance with WA's mining and agricultural regions.
  • At the time, the former transport minister Murray Criddle said the privatisation of the line would deliver a world-class, competitive rail freight service to WA.
  • The state government has said greater public control would allow for more targeted investment and increased use of the freight network.
  • While the passage of the Rail Freight System Bill 2026 through WA parliament is a necessary legal step for returning the network to public ownership, the government still needs to prove the purchase would be economically and financially responsible.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

Twenty-six years after Western Australia's freight rail network was privatised, the WA government is making headway on its plan to buy it back.

The Cook Labor government introduced a bill into parliament earlier this week that, if passed, will establish a legal framework to bring the network back under state control.

But the road to public ownership is paved with obstacles, from warnings about the cost to concerns about government involvement in a commercial supply chain.

Here's what a state-owned freight rail network could mean for Western Australians.

Every year, millions of tonnes of grain and minerals travel across 5,500 kilometres of tracks, connecting the ports of Geraldton, Fremantle, Bunbury, Albany and Esperance with WA's mining and agricultural regions.

But since 2000, when a Liberal-National government sold off the operation and leased the underlying network under a 49-year lease, it has been in private hands — a sale driven by the rail system's debt.

At the time, the former transport minister Murray Criddle said the privatisation of the line would deliver a world-class, competitive rail freight service to WA.

"The new operator will help keep downward pressure on freight rates, improve service delivery and to get more freight off road and onto rail," Mr Criddle said.

Currently operated by Arc Infrastructure, the government is now in commercial negotiations with parent company Brookfield to buy it back.

It's a valid question, and one dividing industry.

The state government has said greater public control would allow for more targeted investment and increased use of the freight network.

The Rail, Tram and Bus Union has welcomed the move.

"Public ownership means taxpayer dollars are reinvested into local services rather than being siphoned off as private corporate profits," WA branch secretary Josh Dekuyer said.

One of the main drivers is the push to reopen the Tier 3 rail lines, which were closed in 2014.

In Bruce Rock, 240 kilometres east of Perth, farmer Jane Fuchsbichler said her operations were affected.

She said the closure of more than 500km of track resulted in more trucks on the road.

"We can't continue with the present situation, local governments are getting a lot of extra challenges because of the increase in trucks and the road toll is increasing," she said.

The move to regain public control of the network has also been welcomed by the state's largest grain handler, CBH Group, which hopes a government buyback will help the infrastructure keep pace with rising production.

In the Goldfields, a government takeover of the network is seen as the only realistic path forward for decade-old plans to realign the existing railway around Kalgoorlie-Boulder's Super Pit gold mine and to develop an intermodal transport facility, akin to an inland port.

The Tier 3 line is not in working condition, with farmers saying the tracks are overgrown with trees up to 3 metres tall and sleepers severely deteriorated.

The government has been vague on the cost, but an independent engineering report from 2020 said it would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to bring the line back into operation.

That's on top of the sale itself, which the government has also been vague about: a "significant investment" in the words of the transport minister.

Former Pastoralists and Graziers Association president Tony Seabrook estimates the figure to be in the "billions".

"The state government is very reluctant to put a figure around it," he said.

The government had commissioned a detailed business case from Deloitte on the Kalgoorlie-Boulder Super Pit realignment last year, but it was never made public.

Mr Seabrook is also concerned that more government control could mean more bureaucracy.

"I'd be very wary of this falling into the hands of government; we've seen what happened with the lamb industry when government took control of that," he told the ABC.

While the passage of the Rail Freight System Bill 2026 through WA parliament is a necessary legal step for returning the network to public ownership, the government still needs to prove the purchase would be economically and financially responsible.

As for support from the Coalition, the leader of the WA Nationals Party Shane Love has welcomed the announcement but called for greater transparency.

Shadow transport minister Steve Martin has echoed the sentiment, telling the ABC more details of the deal, in particular the cost, were needed before the party "could fully assess the proposal".

The state government said should there be a transaction, there would be minimal disruption to Arc's customers and staff.

Arc's parent company, Brookfield, has declined to comment.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 11.8 13 45 56.4
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 9.7 11 45 56.4

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works