Subscribe Sign in

Science / United States

Young people pushing back against artificial intelligence

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceSecondary EducationComputer ScienceRoboticsInternet

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A3×3 A4 D2 D3×17 E3×5 F2×2 all 30 rules
  • To pass the time, Don, played by a young William Shatner, starts feeding pennies into a fortune-telling napkin holder: a grinning devil's head answering yes-or-no questions for a penny-a-pop.
  • Elise Humphreys, 19, has never seen the episode.
  • The latest Gallup study on AI in the US found gen Z's approach to the tool has "significantly" worsened, and that most young people fear its use comes at a cost — to learning.
  • Jenson Rainbird, a 16-year-old high school student from Melbourne, is happy to take part in the technical deceleration by avoiding AI as much as possible.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Elise Humphreys has never seen the episode. She said picture was then digitally manipulated and included one person performing a Nazi salute.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

There's an episode of The Twilight Zone, from late 1960, in which newlyweds Don and Pat Carter take shelter in an Ohio diner after their car breaks down en route to New York City.

Neither expects to be there long; an emergency mechanic just so happens to be around the corner.

To pass the time, Don, played by a young William Shatner, starts feeding pennies into a fortune-telling napkin holder: a grinning devil's head answering yes-or-no questions for a penny-a-pop.

What starts as harmless prompts soon becomes a compulsion as the machine somehow starts nailing the questions. Next thing you know, Don's stuck in a loop, unable to leave the restaurant without asking the machine's thoughts.

Elise Humphreys, 19, has never seen the episode.

Ms Humphreys is studying a double degree in International Relations and International Business at Perth's Curtin University, which encourages the "ethical" use of AI.

Nearly 80 per cent of Australian students reported using generative AI while studying last year, a figure that jumps to 94 per cent in more recent international reports.

The latest Gallup study on AI in the US found gen Z's approach to the tool has "significantly" worsened, and that most young people fear its use comes at a cost — to learning.

In the space of a week or so, calls to slow artificial intelligence down have gone from the margins of public debate to its centre.

Jenson Rainbird, a 16-year-old high school student from Melbourne, is happy to take part in the technical deceleration by avoiding AI as much as possible.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 7.4 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News (Just In)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
ABC News (Just In)as they published this story 13.7 14 67 42
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News (Just In) 12.6 12 67 42

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works