Politics

Your photos, your words and your work: will Labor make it easier for AI companies to take them for free? | Holly Rankin

The Guardian Australia Holly Rankin

16 Sept 2026 12:24 AEST Opinion An argument, written to persuade. Summary

Politics Artificial intelligence Technology Intellectual Property

Changed after publishing · 1 edit

18 Sept 2026 04:31 AEST the headline was changed: Is Your photos, your words and your work: will Labor ~~going~~ make it easier for AI companies to ~~roll over~~ take them for ~~big tech – or will it protect the rights of everyday Australians?~~ free? | Holly Rankin

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed

From the report

This is about protecting the rights of all people to keep their right to decide how their content is used by AI companies.

Headline check

Neither of the two things this headline claims turned up in the report.

“Labor” is named in the headline. We could not find it in the report.
“Holly Rankin” is named in the headline. We could not find it in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. Names are matched as they are spelled, so a report that says “New South Wales” where the headline says “NSW” is queried here when it should not be. How this is checked

This is a summary. The indicators are not. Every score on this page was measured over the full 621-word report, which is the only way the numbers mean anything.

Indicators

Niral Score 13.2 mundaneloaded

Highlighted in the text. Words that carry a fact and quoted words are not counted.

companies15content9every7government6law6permission6copyright5individual4people4rights4train4artists3ask3can’t3choose3consent3ever3opt3proposal3put3regulation3right3technology3training3work3world3benefit2company2fair2family2fight2game2give2global2including2legal2licence2model2models2national2online2photo2photos2piece2posted2properly2seriously2unless2use2want2website2

Sentiment -0.2 hostilefavourable Political diction 0 A story about politics, written without coded language Sourcing 7 unattributednamed sources Mood 45.1 sorrowjoyful

4 read zero: generational, gender, jingoistic, religious

Generational 0 harder on the oldharder on the young Gender 0 no gendered framingframing throughout Jingoistic 0 reports to a readerwrites from a camp Religious 0 not invokedovert

Measurements of how this article is written, not of whether it is correct. How each one is measured.

Measured on The Guardian Australia’s report as filed, which is all we may publish of this one.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet	Niral Score
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story	13.2

How did this read?

Readers

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works

Report a problem with these scores or this rewrite — it goes straight into the public ledger.