Subscribe Sign in

Science

Albanese government considers ‘world-leading’ ban on smart glasses in public offices and buildings

3 min read Rewritten in plain language

Wearable TechnologyTechnologyPoliticsMetaLabor Party

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A2 A3 C1 D1 D2×5 D3×3 E3×2 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • The Albanese government is considering a “world-leading” ban on smart glasses in its offices and service centres as councils around Australia push the technology out of public spaces over privacy fears.
  • The public service minister, Katy Gallagher, said on Thursday she had asked the Australian public service for advice on whether the glasses should be prohibited.
  • Schools and hospitals run by state governments would be left to set their own rules over the technology, which have grown popular but raised public objections.
  • In August, Brisbane city council became the first to ban the glasses from pools and Melbourne’s Yarra city council has banned them from playgrounds, childcare centres and gyms.
  • Rowland said the government was not pursuing a ban but had not “ruled anything out”.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

Minister for public service says the devices pose ‘legitimate privacy and security concerns’ in commonwealth-run workplaces

The Albanese government is considering a “world-leading” ban on smart glasses in its offices and service centres as councils around Australia push the technology out of public spaces over privacy fears.

The government has avoided a ban on the import of the camera-equipped technology and encouraged individual workplaces to set their own rules.

The public service minister, Katy Gallagher, said on Thursday she had asked the Australian public service for advice on whether the glasses should be prohibited.

“We need clear and consistent guidance for public servants,” Gallagher said.

“Smart glasses can raise legitimate privacy and security concerns, particularly because of their ability to record and capture information.”

Commonwealth-run workplaces range from bureaucrats’ offices to Centrelink service centres and CSIRO laboratories.

Schools and hospitals run by state governments would be left to set their own rules over the technology, which have grown popular but raised public objections.

A University of Sydney study of smart glasses-filmed videos posted on Instagram found 60% of a sample could be classified as potential harassment.

The Albanese government said it was seeking to set a world-leading standard. So far, no national government has banned the glasses’ use across their agencies.

Courts in England and Wales in the UK and New York state in the US have banned the technology, while the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency reportedly classified them as body-worn cameras and barred them from the “federal workspace”.

A local council in Sydney on Tuesday became the latest to issue a targeted bans on the use of the technology. Canterbury-Bankstown’s mayor, Bilal El-Hayek, decried what he called “pervert glasses” as the council barred the wearable tech from public pools.

In August, Brisbane city council became the first to ban the glasses from pools and Melbourne’s Yarra city council has banned them from playgrounds, childcare centres and gyms.

The City of Sydney and the Blacktown city councils have prohibited pool patrons from using smart glasses to record.

Speaking to Channel Seven earlier this month, the federal attorney general, Michelle Rowland, praised councils’ decisions and said she would consult businesses on their approach.

“Businesses know that good privacy is good business,” Rowland said.

“But … we want to make sure we get the balance right and we don’t unfairly discriminate against people who are using this technology to better participate in society.”

Vision Australia and some people living with disabilities have praised the technology as a support for people who are blind or have low vision. Rowland said the government was not pursuing a ban but had not “ruled anything out”.

Gallagher said she wanted the Australian public service to set the national standard as a “model employer”.

“Technology is changing rapidly and as a major employer the Commonwealth needs to make sure our workplace policies keep pace,” Gallagher said.

Pending restrictions on smart glasses would be the federal government’s latest workplace technology reform after it issued guidance on the use of AI in the public service last week.

The guidelines indicate employees would not need to be consulted on every new tool but should be consulted for initiatives or changes to how they carry out work.

Businesses will contribute to new national guidelines on AI in workplaces, with Commonwealth Bank, Microsoft, AGL, Telstra, Kmart, Blackmores Group and Ramsay Health Care to attend a roundtable on Friday.

Amanda Rishworth, the employment minister, said the government wanted to use the roundtable to take on the lessons of businesses already using AI.

“Workers and businesses need the capability to adopt new technologies with confidence that appropriate safeguards are in place,” Rishworth said.

Additional reporting from Caitlin Cassidy

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 12.3 12 55 0.2 50.9
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 9.8 10 55 0.3 50.9

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works