Subscribe Sign in

Science

Government considers smart glasses ban for public servants

ABC News (Just In)
4 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceScience and TechnologyInformation Technology IndustryPolitics

Changed after publishing · 1 edit
  • the headline was changed: Government considers smart glasses ban looms as Labor sets out new AI rulesfor public servants

Outlets edit stories after they go out, usually without saying so. We keep what we saw the first time.

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×4 A2 C1 D2×9 D3×4 D4×2 E3×2 F2×6 all 30 rules
  • The federal government is considering a ban on smart glasses in Commonwealth workplaces while advancing a broader suite of AI policies.
  • A ban on smart glasses capable of covertly recording people is being considered for Commonwealth buildings amid concerns about the technology's privacy and security risks.
  • AI will also feature in the upcoming 2026 Intergenerational Report due to be released next week, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers revealing he met with an Anthropic official to discuss the technology's economic opportunities and potential risks.
  • Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has asked the Australian Public Service Commission for advice on the use of smart glasses across Commonwealth workplaces, including whether the technology should be "prohibited" and what exemptions might be appropriate.
  • Mr Chalmers said Australia had a "big opportunity" to lift productivity, investment and living standards, but must not be "complacent" about potential downsides.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

AI will also feature prominently in next week's 2026 Intergenerational Report jobs and investment in decades to come.

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report4 min

The federal government is considering a ban on smart glasses in Commonwealth workplaces while advancing a broader suite of AI policies.

New standards for data centres and frontier AI training are out for consultation as ministers focus on workplace protections, investment and online safety.

Anthony Albanese travels to the US on Friday, where he will hold talks with tech companies and world leaders.

A ban on smart glasses capable of covertly recording people is being considered for Commonwealth buildings amid concerns about the technology's privacy and security risks.

Restricting the use of wearable devices is among a wide range of technology issues on the federal government's agenda, with ministers progressing plans for Australia's uptake of artificial intelligence and related workplace protections, data centres, investment and online safety.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to the US on Friday for high-level talks with tech executives and world leaders while employers gather in Canberra for a roundtable and separate consultation begins on national AI standards for data centres and frontier model training.

AI will also feature in the upcoming 2026 Intergenerational Report due to be released next week, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers revealing he met with an Anthropic official to discuss the technology's economic opportunities and potential risks.

Mr Albanese said AI and online safety would be a theme of his visit to Apple's headquarters in California and attendance at the United Nations General Assembly in New York next week.

"We want Australia to be a country that helps shape the AI age rather than simply responding to it," he said.

With community opposition over the increased availability of more affordable smart glasses capable of secretly recording people, the government has made its first move to rein in the technology.

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has asked the Australian Public Service Commission for advice on the use of smart glasses across Commonwealth workplaces, including whether the technology should be "prohibited" and what exemptions might be appropriate.

Ms Gallagher said the Australian Public Service should always set the standard as a "model employer".

"Smart glasses can raise legitimate privacy and security concerns, particularly because of their ability to record and capture information, and we need clear and consistent guidance for public servants," she said.

The government has already asked the nation's Privacy Commissioner to give the use of smart glasses "priority consideration" amid community concerns about their potential impact.

The government has also opened consultation on national AI standards covering large data centres and the training of frontier AI models in Australia.

The proposed rules would set mandatory requirements for data centres covering power supply, energy costs, water use, location, community engagement and skills.

They would also impose safety, security, transparency and local investment conditions on frontier AI training.

Consultation will remain open until October 9 with the government planning to legislate the standards early in the new year.

Industry Minister Tim Ayres said the standards were about ensuring Australia captured the technology's "enormous opportunities" while maintaining the trust and confidence of the community.

"By setting high standards now, Australia can shape the future of this technology rather than simply adopting standards made overseas," he said.

Assistant Minister for Science, Technology and the Digital Economy Andrew Charlton said the government had been "clear" about welcoming AI investment, provided it was on "Australia's terms".

AI will also feature prominently in next week's 2026 Intergenerational Report, which will examine what the technological shift could mean for productivity, jobs and investment in decades to come.

An excerpt of the report described AI as a "defining influence" on the economy over the next 40 years.

Mr Chalmers said Australia had a "big opportunity" to lift productivity, investment and living standards, but must not be "complacent" about potential downsides.

"The global AI boom is worth hundreds of billions of dollars and we are positioning Australia to capture more of that supply chain," he said.

This week Mr Chalmers met with Anthropic special envoy Jeff Bleich, which the treasurer said was a "really valuable opportunity" to discuss both the economic opportunities of AI and importance of safeguards.

Mr Bleich said Anthropic was committed to realising the "enormous potential" of AI in a "safe, responsible way".

"Working with like-minded countries such as Australia is an important part of that," he said.

Mr Bleich said Australia brought a skilled workforce, strong institutions and a "clear-eyed approach" to new technology.

"We want to invest in those strengths and to keep working with the government so that Australians share in the gains from AI," he said.

Meanwhile, Microsoft, Telstra, Kmart, Blackmores Group and the Commonwealth Bank of Australia are among the employers will be attending an AI roundtable hosted by Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth on Friday.

The meeting is one of five consultations being held this month with unions, employers, small business and academics to help develop Australia's first best practice guidance for AI in the workplace.

Discussions will focus on the lessons from businesses already adopting AI, how to build trust and confidence in the technology and ensuring any benefits reach workers as well as employers.

Ms Rishworth said the consultations would ensure the guide reflected the "realities of modern workplaces".

"Labor believes workers should have confidence that the adoption of AI will improve the way we work, not simply train their replacement," she said.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News (Just In)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC News (Just In)as they published this story 11.7 20 50 0.2 55.3
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News (Just In) 9.5 16 50 0.3 55.3

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works