Subscribe Sign in

Culture

Bruce Pascoe’s new book may spark another culture war. He hopes for ‘decency and intellectual curiosity’ this time

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Australian BooksBooksHistory BooksIndigenous AustraliansCulture

  • The Dark Emu author rails against Christianity, capitalism and colonialism – and Shakespeare and Charles Dickens cop a serve too.
  • On a hot early spring morning in Sydney, Pascoe sits on a stage at the New South Wales State Library to promote his new book.
  • For it did get nasty last time, including with renewed allegations questioning the veracity of his Aboriginal identity, and an academic takedown of his research and methodology.
  • With 406,000 copies sold, Dark Emu remains one of this country’s highest-selling books in the broad category of Australian history.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

One of the two things this headline claims is not in the report.

  • The headline puts “‘decency and intellectual curiosity’” in quotation marks. Nobody says those words anywhere in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

The Dark Emu author rails against Christianity, capitalism and colonialism – and Shakespeare and Charles Dickens cop a serve too.

O n the eve of publication of his new book, Bruce Pascoe is steeling himself for potential controversy that could rival the storm that affected and bruised him for years over the 2014 book that rewrote Australian history: Dark Emu.

Where Dark Emu contentiously sought to reframe pre-invasion Australian First Nations people from hunter-gatherers into farmer-cultivators, Pascoe’s new book, The European Mind: Colonialism, Capitalism, Christianity and How to Recover, sheets home the blame for the excesses of racism and dispossession on to a troika of western shibboleths: Christianity, capitalism and colonialism.

On a hot early spring morning in Sydney, Pascoe sits on a stage at the New South Wales State Library to promote his new book. While “beautiful”, he says the original Mitchell reading room where the event is being hosted is ironically “one of the most colonial” in Sydney, with its early 1900s club atmosphere.

For it did get nasty last time, including with renewed allegations questioning the veracity of his Aboriginal identity, and an academic takedown of his research and methodology.

With his farm-labour wiriness, trademark wild mane of silver hair and long beard, the fit-looking 79-year-old says there have “been times, I admit, when I struggle”.

The book includes a four-page bibliography and 14 pages of endnotes.

With 406,000 copies sold, Dark Emu remains one of this country’s highest-selling books in the broad category of Australian history.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 10.7 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 22 42 47 -0.2 41.6
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 17.9 34 47 -0.2 41.6

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works