Subscribe Sign in

Sport

Manchester City v Premier League: how the legal teams lined up

The Guardian Australia (Sport)
2 min read Rewritten in plain language

Manchester CityPremier LeagueFootballSport

Show what we removed
  • T he result is in from an anticipated Premier League match-up: the legal battle which pitted the league against Manchester City, the team that have dominated the competition in recent years.
  • Leading the City team was David Pannick KC, one of the foremost barristers of his generation, renown for representing the rich and powerful.
  • In 2019, Pannick charged £407,250 for defending Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani, a former Qatari prime minister, involving a two-day trial, which the crossbench peer did not attend.
  • Adam Lewis KC is widely regarded as the country’s preeminent sports barrister and co-authored the leading textbook in the field.
  • Jason Pobjoy KC represented the Premier League alongside Lewis as he did when Everton were docked points for breaching financial rules.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report2 min

David Pannick may not earn as much as Erling Haaland but the club spared no expense to defend themselves against more than 100 charges

T he result is in from an anticipated Premier League match-up: the legal battle which pitted the league against Manchester City, the team that have dominated the competition in recent years. As befitting such a heavyweight clash, both sides fielded a team of lawyers, which lined up as follows:

Leading the City team was David Pannick KC, one of the foremost barristers of his generation, renown for representing the rich and powerful. Previous clients include Queen Elizabeth II, Boris Johnson, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and more than one billionaire sheikh.

Lawyers may not earn as much as the Erling Haaland’s £500,000 a week but Pannick charges a none too shoddy £5,000 an hour. In 2019, Pannick charged £407,250 for defending Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani, a former Qatari prime minister, involving a two-day trial, which the crossbench peer did not attend.

Paul Harris KC a leading sport and commercial silk, also led City’s successful appeal before the court of arbitration for sport (Cas) against Uefa’s Champions League ban on the club for alleged breaches of financial fair play rules. He is said to have been a trusted adviser to the club for more than 20 years.

Another silk on the team was Philip Marshall KC, who specialises in commercial disputes and commercial fraud, and the magic circle law firm Clifford Chance is also involved.

Adam Lewis KC is widely regarded as the country’s preeminent sports barrister and co-authored the leading textbook in the field. His cases include acting for Chelsea at Cas when they successfully halved a two-transfer-window ban imposed by Fifa. He also represented Premiership Rugby at an independent tribunal where the champions Saracens were found to have breached salary cap regulations.

Andrew Hunter KC ’s prominent sports cases include rugby’s “ bloodgate ” scandal and Formula One’s spygate scandal when McLaren were fined $100m (then £50m) and docked all their points in the constructors’ championship when found in possession of documents belonging to Ferrari.

Jason Pobjoy KC represented the Premier League alongside Lewis as he did when Everton were docked points for breaching financial rules. Pobjoy argued that Everton’s “unreasonable conduct in the proceedings unnecessarily and significantly increased” costs for the league, which sought to recover £4.9m in lawyers’ fees. However, Everton argued the costs were “eye-watering” and were ordered to pay only £1.7m. Pobjoy has also represented the Football Association but is best known for his civil liberties, public and human rights law cases, including pro bono work.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Sport)'s report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How outlets headlined it

Each outlet's own headline. Struck through: the loaded words our version leaves out. Plainest first.

  • The Guardian Australia (Sport) Manchester City v Premier League: how the legal teams lined up plain
  • The Guardian Australia (Sport) Manchester City guilty of breaching Premier League’s financial fair play rules – as it happened plain
  • Brisbane Times Manchester City found guilty of 114 financial charges in seismic EPL ruling plain
  • The Guardian Australia (Sport) Manchester City found guilty of breaking Premier League’s financial fair play rules plain
  • The West Australian Man City guilty over hundreds of rule breaches: reports plain
  • The West Australian Manchester City v the Premier League: a timeline plain

How each outlet filed it

Also covered by Brisbane Times, WAtoday, The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, The West Australian. We hold only their summary of it, not the report, so there is nothing of theirs to measure here.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Sport)as they published this story 13.2 14 33 -0.3 54.3
The Guardian Australia (Sport) 5.7 5 74 -0.2 53.6
The Guardian Australia (Sport) 12.6 18 57 0.1 51.4
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Sport) 4.6 5 74 -0.2 53.6

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works

The same event elsewhere

8 other outlets filed this story. The scoreboard above is what they did differently.