In an eight-year saga, Manchester City and the English Premier League have been fighting over more than 100 allegations of breaches of financial rules.
Politics
Manchester City v the Premier League: a timeline
From the report
This is a summary. The indicators are not. The scores were measured over this summary alone, which is less of the article than we would like and makes them less certain.
How outlets headlined it
Each outlet's own headline. Struck through: the loaded words our version leaves out. Plainest first.
- The West Australian Manchester City v the Premier League: a timeline plain
- The Guardian Australia (Sport) Manchester City guilty of breaching Premier League’s financial fair play rules – as it happened plain
- Brisbane Times Manchester City found guilty of 114 financial charges in seismic EPL ruling plain
- The Guardian Australia (Sport) Manchester City found guilty of breaking Premier League’s financial fair play rules plain
- The West Australian Man City guilty over hundreds of rule breaches: reports plain
- The Guardian Australia (Sport) Manchester City v Premier League: how the legal teams lined up plain
How each outlet filed it
Also covered by Brisbane Times, WAtoday, The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, The West Australian. We hold only their summary of it, not the report, so there is nothing of theirs to measure here.
| Outlet | Niral Score | Adjectives | Sourcing | Sentiment | Happiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The West Australianas they published this story | 4.2 | 0 | 42 | -0.1 | 50 |
| The Guardian Australia (Sport) | 5.7 | 5 | 74 | -0.2 | 53.6 |
| The Guardian Australia (Sport) | 12.6 | 18 | 57 | 0.1 | 51.4 |
| The Guardian Australia (Sport) | 13.2 | 14 | 33 | -0.3 | 54.3 |
How did this read?
Sign in to react.
Readers
Comments
Nothing here yet.
Sign in to comment.
Questions
Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.
Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works
Report a problem with these scores or this rewrite — it goes straight into the public ledger.
The same event elsewhere
8 other outlets filed this story. The scoreboard above is what they did differently.