Subscribe Sign in

Courts / New South Wales

NSW set to change how sexual assault complainants give evidence

ABC News
3 min read Rewritten in plain language

CourtsDomestic ViolenceSexual Offences

Show what we removed Rules applied: A3×2 D2×8 D3×3 D4×2 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • Pre-recorded testimony for adult sexual assault complainants may soon be allowed in NSW under proposed government changes.
  • Attorney-General Michael Daley will introduce the "commonsense" reforms in the NSW parliament on Tuesday.
  • Women's Safety Commissioner Hannah Tonkin said sexual assault complainants were often required to give detailed accounts of events "years after their assault", which "takes an immense toll on their wellbeing, healing and recovery".
  • Advocacy group Fair Agenda has been campaigning for NSW courts to allow sexual assault complainants to pre-record the entirety of their evidence.
  • Full Stop Australia chief executive Karen Bevan said the suite of proposed reforms were "a step in the right direction".

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

There is nothing in this headline a machine can check against the report: no figure, no name and no quotation.

Nothing was measured here, so nothing is claimed. How this is checked

Read the full reportHide the full report3 min

Pre-recorded testimony for adult sexual assault complainants may soon be allowed in NSW under proposed government changes.

However, complainants will still have to appear for cross-examination and re-examination.

The state government is set to introduce the reforms on Tuesday.

Complainants in sexual assault trials will be able to give pre-recorded evidence under reforms proposed by the New South Wales government.

The planned changes will also trial "ground rules" hearings at three District Courts, and narrow the circumstances in which courts can access a complainant's counselling records.

Attorney-General Michael Daley will introduce the "commonsense" reforms in the NSW parliament on Tuesday.

"We want to help them give their best evidence by ensuring they do not need to tell their story multiple times and deterring inappropriate and irrelevant questioning in court."

Under the proposed changes, police interviews recorded with complainants and special witnesses will be able to be used as evidence-in-chief in adult sexual assault proceedings.

Such recordings are already admissible for children under 16, and people with a cognitive impairment.

Complainants will still have to appear for cross-examination and re-examination — a process described by some witnesses as bruising and invasive — until a separate review next year considers the feasibility of allowing for pre-recorded evidence.

Women's Safety Commissioner Hannah Tonkin said sexual assault complainants were often required to give detailed accounts of events "years after their assault", which "takes an immense toll on their wellbeing, healing and recovery".

"Allowing complainants' pre-recorded evidence-in-chief to be used during sexual assault trials will enable them to give their account much earlier, in a safe setting, and to start rebuilding their lives sooner," Dr Tonkin said.

Advocacy group Fair Agenda has been campaigning for NSW courts to allow sexual assault complainants to pre-record the entirety of their evidence.

Campaign manager Jacinta Masters said while the state government's announcement was a step forward, "this is not what we've been asking for".

"We've been very clear pre-recorded evidence is needed for evidence-in-chief, cross-examination and re-examination," Ms Masters said.

Ms Masters said Fair Agenda had also been campaigning for prosecutors, not police, to pre-record evidence-in-chief.

The state government's proposed reforms will also include a three-year trial of ground rules hearings at Parramatta, Wollongong and Dubbo District Courts.

Under the pilot, hearings will be held ahead of complainants' evidence to allow the courts to provide directions about how the proceedings can run, including parameters about how a witness is to be questioned, and what they can be questioned on.

Ground rules hearings are already used in child sexual assault proceedings in NSW.

Dr Tonkin welcomed the pilot, which will run from 2027 to 2030.

"The introduction of ground rules hearings will reduce stress for complainants and improve the precision of their evidence and the efficiency of trials by ensuring that questions directed at the complainant are appropriate, relevant, and focused on the issues in dispute," she said.

The final tranche of the state government's announcement will mean complainants' counselling records can only be accessed by the court "when it is necessary", pending further research.

Victim-survivors and advocates have been campaigning for counselling records to be kept confidential from alleged perpetrators, with a petition led by freelance journalist Nina Funnell gathering almost 15,000 signatures in support of the call.

The change will be made ahead of a University of Sydney review into the current operation of the Sexual Assault Communications Privilege, which will examine potential alternate models, including whether counselling communications should be prohibited from criminal proceedings.

Full Stop Australia chief executive Karen Bevan said the suite of proposed reforms were "a step in the right direction".

"We look forward to working with the government to extend these reforms so that every victim-survivor in NSW benefits from them," she said.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is ABC News's report with its verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
ABC Newsas they published this story 10.1 5 51 -0.2 41.4
Mundane Readneutralized from ABC News 9.4 5 51 -0.2 41.4

Sign in to react.

This story is about a matter before the courts. Comments are closed on those, because what is written under them can prejudice a trial or damage somebody who has been charged with nothing. If something here is wrong, tell us — that we do read.