Subscribe Sign in

Politics / Brisbane, QLD

One Nation boss called David Farley an ‘asshole’ in lead-up to Farrer byelection, text messages reveal

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

One NationPoliticsAustralian Political Donations

Show what we removed
  • Documents seen by Guardian Australia show that Kelvin Morton has also clashed with party HQ staff and Brisbane volunteers.
  • A One Nation party spokesperson said that Farley was “a dedicated One Nation MP”.
  • Morton, who claims on his LinkedIn to be a “strategic business transformation leader” with large experience with some of the world’s biggest companies, was appointed as general manager in February.
  • The dispute arose after Morton and the Lilley branch coordinator, Mark McGuire, clashed over access to promotional materials for a different event, which prompted Morton to suspend him.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

All four things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Documents seen by Guardian Australia show that Kelvin Morton has also clashed with party HQ staff and Brisbane volunteers.

One Nation’s general manager, Kelvin Morton – brought in by the party to improve its vetting processes – referred to David Farley as an “asshole” just days before Farley’s Farrer byelection win for the party in May.

In a series of text messages seen by Guardian Australia, Morton responds to a news article published in the Sydney Morning Herald about infighting among senior party figures over Farley’s before undeclared support for the Labor party.

A One Nation party spokesperson said that Farley was “a dedicated One Nation MP”.

“The comments made do not reflect the view of the party.”

Tensions between Farley and other One Nation MPs and staff have reportedly been high since he was elected to parliament, with the party having to publicly criticise him after he claimed One Nation’s migration policy was not dissimilar to the Labor government’s.

Morton, who claims on his LinkedIn to be a “strategic business transformation leader” with large experience with some of the world’s biggest companies, was appointed as general manager in February.

Documents seen by the Guardian show he wrote to the Lilley branch in Brisbane advising it of federal intervention, which included removing the entire committee of volunteers.

The dispute arose after Morton and the Lilley branch coordinator, Mark McGuire, clashed over access to promotional materials for a different event, which prompted Morton to suspend him.

Other volunteer branch members and the president, Deb Dalton, complained about McGuire’s treatment, advising head office that the branch committee would cease volunteering in protest.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 5.6 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 6.9 6 77 57
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 5.7 5 77 57

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works