Subscribe Sign in

Science

The Coalition says it wants cheaper power, not ideology. But its evidence-free plan is all ideology | Adam Morton

1 min read Opinion An argument, written to persuade. Rewritten in plain language

Climate changePolitics

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×5 A2×2 A3×6 C1 C2×2 C3 D2×7 D3×15 E3×3 F2×10 all 30 rules
  • The reheated plans to scrap renewable schemes, boost fossil fuels and revive nuclear are not based on fact but ideology.
  • In a press release on Wednesday, first given to the Australian for a not exactly hard-won “exclusive”, it declared “Australians need cheaper power, not more ideology”.
  • As one campaigner put it, it is a plan to let climate change rip.
  • Most of what the Coalition announced wasn’t new.
  • According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, 85% of new power capacity built last year was renewable, and 90% of the renewables built were cheaper than the lowest fossil fuel alternative.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

G ive the Coalition points for chutzpah. That worldview says climate change is not real, or at least not a real concern, and Australia should abolish nearly all plans to respond to or prepare the economy for the changes under way.

Headline check

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

The reheated plans to scrap renewable schemes, boost fossil fuels and revive nuclear are not based on fact but ideology.

G ive the Coalition points for chutzpah, if nothing else. In a press release on Wednesday, first given to the Australian for a not exactly hard-won “exclusive”, it declared “Australians need cheaper power, not more ideology”.

You don’t have to get far beyond that headline to find its position comes from a worldview that is ideology on steroids.

As one campaigner put it, it is a plan to let climate change rip.

From a here-and-now consumer point of view, it is a plan that is based on the fallacy that the big jump in power bills in recent years is due to renewable energy and a legislated net zero target. Evidence and most experts say otherwise.

Most of what the Coalition announced wasn’t new. The fresh bit is that it has promised to package up eight commitments in a new bill that would be introduced within 30 days if it was elected. At least half of those commitments are to abolish policies that were introduced under Coalition governments led by Scott Morrison, Tony Abbott and John Howard.

Angus Taylor and Matt Canavan say they would tear up the safeguard mechanism, introduced under Abbott, in theory to put a limit on pollution from industrial sites.

According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, 85% of new power capacity built last year was renewable, and 90% of the renewables built were cheaper than the lowest fossil fuel alternative.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6.3 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingPoliticalSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australiaas they published this story 18.4 24 43 -0.2 -0.1 40.3
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia 10.1 18 43 0 0.0 47.7

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works