Subscribe Sign in

Sport

The Spin | Robots bowling the doosra are some way off but AI is already reshaping cricket

1 min read Rewritten in plain language

CricketSportArtificial intelligence

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A3×3 A4×2 D1 D2×11 D3×18 E3×15 E5 F2×15 all 30 rules
  • Artificial intelligence is not replacing the player, coach or analyst, but it is allowing them to do more.
  • For Wilde, AI has made him more autonomous.
  • For a batter, that may mean knowing where a bowler is most likely to pitch and which risks are worth taking.
  • China staged its second World Humanoid Robot Games last month.
  • We may see fewer sentences with the fingerprints of writers such as Gideon Haigh or Mike Atherton and more efficient versions of what cricket writing is expected to sound like.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

Headline as published: The Spin | Robots bowling the perfect doosra are some way off but AI is already reshaping cricket

All two things this headline claims are in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked

Artificial intelligence is not replacing the player, coach or analyst, but it is allowing them to do more.

Freddie Wilde, an analyst with teams in the Indian Premier League and the Hundred and head of cricket intelligence at CricViz, says “almost all elements” of his day-to-day work have now been touched by AI. The models are improving, the tools are faster and more information is being processed.

For Wilde, AI has made him more autonomous. Tasks that once needed a data engineer or data scientist can now be tried by the analyst themselves.

For a batter, that may mean knowing where a bowler is most likely to pitch and which risks are worth taking. For a bowler, it may mean identifying a weakness against a particular angle, length or field.

China staged its second World Humanoid Robot Games last month. More than 500 robots competed in football, athletics, boxing and more. Many stumbled or needed human help, but one ran 100m in 8.64sec.

The footage was amusing, but the progress was sobering.

Ray Kurzweil ’s Law of Accelerating Returns argues that technological advancement is exponential.

The quieter transformation is already under way, in the systems being built to measure and develop players.

Prof Adeela ahmed Shafi, of the University of Gloucestershire and a board member at Gloucester CC, says the aim is not to replace coaches’ judgment, but to make it visible.

We may see fewer sentences with the fingerprints of writers such as Gideon Haigh or Mike Atherton and more efficient versions of what cricket writing is expected to sound like.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 9 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Sport)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Sport)as they published this story 11.9 24 24 -0.1 51.1
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Sport) 10 22 24 -0.1 51.1

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works