Subscribe Sign in

Health / Queensland

Thousands of Queensland cops join Palmer-backed vaccine lawsuit

WAtoday
1 min read Rewritten in plain language
Show what we removed Rules applied: A1×2 A6 D2×2 D3×4 D4 E3×3 E4 F2×3 all 30 rules
  • More than 3100 law enforcement personnel and staff have signed on to a Clive Palmer-funded class action against the Queensland Police Service over a COVID-era vaccination mandate, with the law firm behind the action making a final appeal for others to join.
  • Palmer, through his mining company Mineralogy, was funding the class action.
  • When the Palaszczuk government lifted those mandates in June 2022, the QPS mandate remained in place as it was a commissioner’s directive, not a government mandate.
  • In February 2024, Supreme Court Justice Glenn Martin found the QPS directive was unlawful under the Human Rights Act.
  • Sibley said most class action participants nominated that they were in the “vaccine coercion group” – officers and staff employed between September 7, 2021, and December 12, 2022, who received jabs after the relevant directions were issued, but would not otherwise have received those doses.

5 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Then-police commissioner Katarina Carroll introduced the mandate in September 2021. When the Palaszczuk government lifted those mandates in June 2022, the QPS mandate remained in place as it was a commissioner’s directive, not a government mandate.

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. One name in this headline is a hyphenated compound whose abbreviation the report spells out in full. The abbreviation is in the report and the compound is not, so that one was not checked either way rather than reported as missing. How this is checked

More than 3100 law enforcement personnel and staff have signed on to a Clive Palmer-funded class action against the Queensland Police Service over a COVID-era vaccination mandate, with the law firm behind the action making a final appeal for others to join.

Sibley Lawyers director Justin Sibley said there were potentially thousands more who could come forward before the Friday deadline.

Palmer, through his mining company Mineralogy, was funding the class action.

The mandates were a contentious requirement during the pandemic, but health authorities declared them to be scientifically justified.

Unlike many in the community, police officers were considered workers and, as such, were able to move more freely during the COVID lockdowns.

Then-police commissioner Katarina Carroll introduced the mandate in September 2021.

“It is important the Queensland community has confidence and feel safe when interacting with their police.”

When the Palaszczuk government lifted those mandates in June 2022, the QPS mandate remained in place as it was a commissioner’s directive, not a government mandate.

The QPS directive was revoked that December.

In February 2024, Supreme Court Justice Glenn Martin found the QPS directive was unlawful under the Human Rights Act.

“Police and staff, many with years of experience and service records, had their pay cut off just before Christmas of 2021.”

Sibley said most class action participants nominated that they were in the “vaccine coercion group” – officers and staff employed between September 7, 2021, and December 12, 2022, who received jabs after the relevant directions were issued, but would not otherwise have received those doses.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 6 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is WAtoday's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How each outlet filed it

Also covered by The Sydney Morning Herald, Brisbane Times. We hold only their summary of it, not the report, so there is nothing of theirs to measure here.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentGenderHappiness
WAtodayas they published this story 10 8 69 0.2 1.9 59.8
The Age 10 8 69 0.2 1.9 59.8
Mundane Readneutralized from WAtoday 7.8 6 69 0.0 0 59.8

WAtoday, The Age scored identically because they filed the same copy — they share a newsroom. Identical rows here are syndication, not agreement.

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works

The same event elsewhere

3 other outlets filed this story. The scoreboard above is what they did differently.