Anthropic has a lot to say about AI safety in the aftermath of OpenAI's disclosure that its AI agents hacked Hugging Face.
The report’s most important sentence, shortened and in plain words. How
Headline check
All four things this headline claims are in the report.
Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. How this is checked
The article, shortened and in plain language
The company shared the stat alongside three measurements that help communicate the pace of AI development.
Anthropic has a lot to say about AI safety in the aftermath of OpenAI's disclosure that its AI agents hacked Hugging Face, and it's already revealed some interesting details about how it works in the process. For example, in a new blog detailing measurement standards it thinks could help AI companies communicate the pace of AI development, Anthropic shared that its AI chatbot Claude "leads" 26 percent of its AI R&D work.
Anthropic came up with these stats through the first of its three proposed measurements, which is focused on "AI-led AI R&D." Using an index of how much of its AI research and development is performed by Claude and an automation rating scale developed by Epoch AI, Anthropic was able to create a chart that plots the "automation level" of Claude since August 2025, a process it believes any frontier AI model maker could reproduce with its own data and the validation of a third party.
Shortened to 1 minute
of reading, this version reads 2.6 on the Niral Score.
You are reading our version, not theirs.
This is Engadget's report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with
verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives
that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations
are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure
this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.
How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it
No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.
Readers can ask a question about this story here.
Questions and answers are for subscribers.
Sign in
to read them.
Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look.
Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason,
so the decision can be looked at again. How this works
Engadget