EngadgetThree OpenAI safety researchers have posted an open letter to OpenAI disputing their dismissals. Last week, OpenAI dismissed three workers who allegedly shared information with an external AI safety organization.
Science
Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute their dismissals in open letter
From the report
How outlets headlined it
Each outlet's own headline. Struck through: the loaded words our plainer version leaves out. Fewest struck first.
- Engadget Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute their dismissals in open letter
- BBC News (Technology) Fired OpenAI researchers say they were let go for 'prioritising safety'
-
TechCrunch
Fired OpenAI safety researchers dispute misconduct claims, warn of
chillingeffect 1 change
Headline check
The one thing this headline claims did not turn up in the report.
- “Fired” is named in the headline. We could not find it in the report.
Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. Names are matched as they are spelled, so a report that says “New South Wales” where the headline says “NSW” is queried here when it should not be. How this is checked
A summary of Engadget’s report. The score is for the full 511-word report.
How loaded each outlet’s writing was
| Outlet | Language Load | Adjectivesper 100 words | Sourcing | Mood |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engadgetas they published this story | 5.8 | 1.0 | 78 | 51.2 |
| BBC News (Technology) | 6.3 | 1.3 | 65 | 49.1 |
| TechCrunch | 10.6 | 1.2 | 77 | 43.9 |
How did this read?
Sign in to react.
Comments
Comments are not open yet. They will be once there is someone to read every one before it appears. If something here is wrong, tell us — that we do read.
Report a problem with these scores or this rewrite — it goes straight into the public ledger.
The same event elsewhere
3 outlets from 2 newsrooms reported this story: the one you are reading and the other 2 below. The table above compares the reports we could score. Compare how 3 outlets covered it.