Subscribe Sign in

Culture

Louise Haigh: UK must heed warnings from AI experts

The Guardian Australia (Technology)
1 min read Rewritten in plain language

Artificial intelligenceTechnology PolicyLouise HaighAnthropicOpenAI

Show what we removed Rules applied: A1 A3 A9 C2×4 D2×2 D3×7 E3×3 F2 all 30 rules
  • Ministers must “heed the warnings” from industry leaders about the threat posed by AI, Louise Haigh has said, amid calls for Andy Burnham to use the G20 to drive global regulation.
  • In a speech at the TUC conference on Tuesday, Haigh said that the public was worried about jobs and their children’s future, after three Anthropic researchers said that artificial intelligence could wipe out humanity within the decade.
  • Paul Nowak, the general secretary of the TUC, said AI was a “clear and present danger to workers and wider society”, and urged Burnham to show global leadership.
  • On Monday night, one of the founders of Anthropic, Jack Clark, said that an AI “kill switch” held by a third party may need to be mandatory for companies, saying it was something society “might want to eventually pass rules around”.

4 sentences from our version of the report, chosen to cover it. Nothing here is written; every line is in the article below. How

Headline check

The one thing this headline claims is in the report.

Figures, names and quoted words in the headline, looked for in the report itself — not in the summary above. One claim in this headline could be checked, so this is a narrow pass and not a thorough one. How this is checked

First secretary warns of ‘huge risks’ of technology as PM is urged to use next year’s G20 to drive global regulation.

Ministers must “heed the warnings” from industry leaders about the threat posed by AI, Louise Haigh has said, amid calls for Andy Burnham to use the G20 to drive global regulation.

The first secretary said that while AI had large potential to improve lives, and the government wanted to capitalise on the technology, there were “clearly huge risks to our national security and society if the right guardrails are not put in place”.

In a speech at the TUC conference on Tuesday, Haigh said that the public was worried about jobs and their children’s future, after three Anthropic researchers said that artificial intelligence could wipe out humanity within the decade.

Labour MPs and peers stepped up calls for the government to work with international partners to impose regulations on the technology, with Darren Jones, before Keir Starmer’s chief secretary, calling for Burnham to put international G20 regulation on the agenda when the UK hosts the summit next year.

Paul Nowak, the general secretary of the TUC, said AI was a “clear and present danger to workers and wider society”, and urged Burnham to show global leadership.

Over the weekend, the company urged its competitors and governments to coordinate a global slowdown in AI development.

On Monday night, one of the founders of Anthropic, Jack Clark, said that an AI “kill switch” held by a third party may need to be mandatory for companies, saying it was something society “might want to eventually pass rules around”.

Shortened to 1 minute of reading, this version reads 4.4 on the Niral Score.

You are reading our version, not theirs. This is The Guardian Australia (Technology)'s report shortened to its most important sentences, in plainer words, with verdicts and loaded words taken out. Plain description stays, and so do adjectives that carry a fact, such as "former" or "federal". The reporting, the facts and the quotations are theirs — quotations are never edited — and the indicators beside it measure this version. Hover or tap Adjectives to see every one left in the text.

How this outlet filed it, and how we rewrote it

No other newsroom we read has filed on this event, so there is nothing to compare it with yet.

Outlet Niral ScoreAdjectivesSourcingSentimentHappiness
The Guardian Australia (Technology)as they published this story 7.9 9 81 -0.2 51.1
Mundane Readneutralized from The Guardian Australia (Technology) 5.5 8 81 -0.2 51.1

Sign in to react.

Comments

Nothing here yet.

Sign in to comment.

Questions

Readers can ask a question about this story here. Questions and answers are for subscribers. Sign in to read them.

Comments are read before they appear where anything in them needs a person to look. Nothing posted here is ever deleted; a comment taken down keeps its text and the reason, so the decision can be looked at again. How this works