OpenAI projected to bring in $20bn less in revenue than expected
Reported by 2 outlets. Every outlet’s headline, how the story developed, and how loaded the writing was in each report we could read in full.
How outlets headlined it
Each outlet's own headline.
- The Guardian Australia (Technology) OpenAI projected to bring in $20bn less in revenue than expected
- TechCrunch OpenAI’s revenue is reportedly $20 billion less than previously projected
How it developed
- TechCrunch filed OpenAI’s revenue is reportedly $20 billion less than previously projected
- The Guardian Australia (Technology) filed OpenAI projected to bring in $20bn less in revenue than expected
Each row is the same event as one outlet told it, and the shaded row is ours: one of these reports in our plainer version, scored by the same engines, with the report it came from named. The bottom row is the spread between the outlets — our own row is excluded from it, because including it would let us widen the gap we are advertising.
Each cell shows what the outlet filed and, under it in green where it differs, what our version of that same report reads. Those are the numbers on the article page and in the extension: one article, one pair of readings, wherever you meet it.
| Outlet | Headline | Language Load | Adjectivesper 100 words | Mood |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian Australia (Technology) | OpenAI projected to bring in $20bn less in revenue than expected | 9.6 | 1.8 | 55.5 |
| TechCrunch | OpenAI’s revenue is reportedly $20 billion less than previously projected | 7.9 | 1.4 | 55.4 |
| Mundane Read our version of The Guardian Australia (Technology)’s report, which arrived with a Language Load of 9.6 | OpenAI projected to bring in $20bn less in revenue than expected | 7.3 | 1.8 | 55.5 |
| Spread | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | |
A reading is a column only when it finds something in this story, the rule that lists it beside an article. What each one means.